THOUGHTS

Sustainable Development Is Simply Crisis Management

25/08/2025 12:29 PM
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors.
By :
Prof Datuk Dr Ahmad Ibrahim

In recent years, the term “sustainable development” has become a ubiquitous catchphrase in public discourse – invoked by governments, corporations, universities, and civil society alike. It conjures images of green cities, clean energy, ethical business, and inclusive societies.

But beneath this optimistic veneer lies a sobering reality: sustainable development is, in essence, a sophisticated and continuous exercise in crisis management.

To understand sustainable development is to acknowledge the relentless string of environmental, social, and economic crises that humanity has faced – and continues to face.

From climate change and biodiversity loss to food insecurity, widening inequality, and fragile public health systems, these are not isolated events but symptoms of a systemic imbalance in how we manage our resources, societies, and economies.

A challenge to deal with sustainable development

As is true for most countries, we in Malaysia also have to deal with sustainable development. It is a challenge.

Admittedly, the modern sustainability movement was not born out of convenience, but from necessity.

The publication of the Brundtland Report in 1987, which first defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”, was itself a response to the crises of the time – environmental degradation, resource depletion, and poverty.

Fast forward to today, and the crises have multiplied in complexity and scale.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of global health systems and supply chains. It is the same in the Gaza conflict which has taken its toll on the health of the people enduring the crisis. The climate emergency is manifesting in devastating floods, wildfires, and droughts worldwide.

Economic inequality has worsened, with wealth concentrating at the top while millions struggle for basic necessities. Each crisis demands urgent action, but more importantly, demands that we rethink how our systems function.

At its heart, sustainable development is about anticipating, preventing, managing, and recovering from crises in ways that strengthen the resilience of societies and ecosystems. It recognises that crises are inevitable in a finite, interconnected world – but how we respond to them determines whether they become turning points for progress or preludes to collapse.

SDGs a global crisis management blueprint

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations are, in effect, a global crisis management blueprint.

Each goal addresses a critical risk area: Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) tackles the crisis of food insecurity; Goal 13 (Climate Action) confronts the climate emergency; Goal 10 (Reduced Inequalities) addresses the crisis of social and economic disparity.

Sustainable development frameworks provide a roadmap for managing these crises holistically rather than in isolation.

Effective crisis management in sustainable development is not about eliminating crises entirely – an impossible feat – but about building resilience, reducing vulnerability, and ensuring that the shocks of today do not become the disasters of tomorrow.

It requires navigating tough trade-offs: Should a nation prioritise economic growth or environmental preservation? Should limited public funds go to social protection schemes or green infrastructure? Should fossil fuel-dependent economies abruptly shift to renewables, risking job losses, or transition gradually, risking climate inaction? These are complex crisis management decisions masquerading as policy choices.

For governments, especially in developing nations like Malaysia, this understanding is crucial. Climate change-induced floods and food insecurity are not just environmental issues – they are economic and security threats.

Managing these crises requires more than ad hoc responses; it demands embedding sustainability principles into the core of policy design, fiscal planning, and national development strategies.

Role of private sector

Furthermore, the private sector must view sustainability not as corporate social responsibility, but as business continuity planning in an age of poly-crises – where climate shocks, pandemics, geopolitical tensions, and digital risks collide.

There is a loud call for industries to shift their business model from linear to circular. A circular economy has gained wide recognition as a way to deal with the crisis.

Ultimately, sustainable development is a long game of crisis management. But history shows that crises often catalyse innovation and reform. Yes, many of the world’s innovations were born out of crises. The Great Depression gave rise to social safety nets. The oil shocks of the 1970s spurred energy diversification.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital transformation. If we can learn to manage today’s crises wisely, embedding resilience and foresight into our systems, we can steer the world towards a genuinely sustainable future. Not by avoiding crises, but by ensuring we emerge from them stronger, fairer, and wiser.

-- BERNAMA

Prof Dato Dr Ahmad Ibrahim (ahmadibrahim@ucsiuniversity.edu.my) is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an associate fellow at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya.

(The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and AWS and do not reflect the official policy or position of BERNAMA)